Originally posted on The Most Revolutionary Act: By Jeffrey A. Tucker | Brownstone Institute | September 14, 2021 How significant is it that the two top FDA officials responsible for vaccine research resigned last week and this week signed a letter in The Lancet that strongly warns against vaccine boosters? This is a remarkable sign that the…
The Meaning of the FDA Resignations – A Smoking Gun?
By Jack Davis
September 16, 2021 at 4:07pm
As if a day with 166,284 news coronavirus cases and 2,678 deaths from COVID-19 were not bad enough, a report has now emerged that the protection offered by one of the major vaccines used in the United States declines quickly.
“The first six months are great, but you can’t count on that being stable out to a year and beyond,” Moderna President Stephen Hoge said on a conference call with investors, according to Reuters.
Moderna said in a news release that there was a 36 percentage point difference in the rate of breakthrough infections between those who were vaccinated roughly 13 months ago and those vaccinated roughly eight months ago.
“The increased risk of breakthrough in this analysis quantifies the impact of waning immunity,” Moderna said, adding that the falloff in protection comes “between the median follow-up time of 8 months and 13 months since first dose. The Company believes this adds to evidence of potential benefit of a booster dose.”
“Manuscripts summarizing both findings have been posted to preprint servers and will be submitted for peer-reviewed publication,” the company said.
I first posted this in March of 2020. I am reposting for those who may have missed it.
Have you heard of Event 201?
What if I told you that in October 2019 a panel of global experts from the fields of business, public health and government met in New York (organized/supported/funded by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation) to discuss, simulate and solve a global catastrophe? What if I told you this tabletop exercise centered around a global health concern and its affects on the global economy, and how governments, businesses and health professionals should respond in such an event?
Recent years showed that the world sees about 200 epidemics per year. The panel met to discuss how to respond should EVENT 201 become a global pandemic. What if I told you the simulated health concern -the “pretend” pandemic- discussed in October 2019 was centered around a possible coronavirus outbreak?
That was Event 201.
A massive coincidence? They say it is. They say Event 201 did not predict our current predicament. A coronavirus scenario was likely, so that’s what they simulated.
But do we really think they would admit it if they did know? It’s very possible the individuals on the panel did not know, but the left hand often does not know what the right hand is doing-correct?
I don’t know if I believe in such a large coincidence. Decide for yourself.
Take a look at the video recap posted by the group that hosted the event. The hypothetical news reports and proposed global response are eerily familiar.
A Mom Looking Up 