“This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 (Figure 1) providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission. A similar situation was described for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100.160 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89.821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3.395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%) . One week before, the COVID-19 case rate per 100.000 was higher among the subgroup of the vaccinated compared to the subgroup of the unvaccinated in all age groups of 30 years or more. “
In this video the doctor does a pretty good job explaining the way the MRNA vaccines are supposed to work but he also hypothesizes possible dangers. I appreciate him because he’s not trying to create fear, but he’s also not blindly telling us to trust it. He says we simply do not know what the long-term effects are going to be and that is such an excellent point. We don’t know, therefore there is no reason to be forcing this upon people. The fact that the governments of the world want to force it on people is highly suspicious in the least. And he doesn’t even touch on graphene oxide and other possible mysterious substances within the solution.
This video was posted by my dear friend S.T. Lloyd on her blog Serve Him In The Waiting. Hey Sandra!
Anyway, this is definitely worth the watch. Did you know, the DNA needs to change by ONLY 1 % for the person to no longer be human? Well, the video discusses this very thing, and more.
(Natural News) The climate change hoax has collapsed. A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures, meaning that all the human activity targeted by radical climate change alarmists — combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet.
Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”
The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures. Natural variations in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes in global temperature, the researchers explain.
As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming……click link for more